|
"WHERE
ARE THE BONES HIDDEN?" Ray Crowe A recent TV
"panel-type" show ("Town Hall," Nov. 22nd,
KATU, Portland) concerning Bigfoot, had a
critic that asked where the bones were? The
host, Jack Faust, apparently knowing Bigfoot is
a myth... therefore there are no bones, moved
on before the question could be addressed by
Bigfoot supporters. Here’s a possible answer to
the oft asked question, "where are the
bones?" Does an animal bury its dead? There
are reports of African elephants burying
bones...and even people, .under brush and
leaves ("Among The Elephants," 1976,
Hamilton), but to deliberately intern
a "companion" seems like it would require a
high degree of intelligence, even if it were
only to keep other animals from scavenging the
corpse. Many animals pair for life, and
anthropomorphically (given human qualities)
speaking, appear to display sadness if the mate
is killed. I once observed in the Metolius
River area of Oregon, a road where numerous
chipmunks had been run over by careless autos,
and the surviving mate stood defiantly next
to the remains of its companion. As often as
not, two squished bodies could be seen side by
side. Georges Leroy wrote (in 1762-1781) in
his letters: The naturalist must abandon his
scalpel, leave his study, go into the woods
to follow the movements of these sentient
beings (animals) to judge the developments
and effects of their faculty of feeling, and see
how, by the repeated action of sensation and
the exercise of memory, their instinct rises
to the level of intelligence ("Non-Human
Thought," 1967, Graven). Keeping this in
mind, let’s forget the critics-skeptics-experts
for awhile...and see what Bigfoot himself has to
say about burials. Bigfoot has had several
curious reports concerning its dead
members (three here have not been previously
published, appearing first in Track Record #23).
One should keep in mind also, that more than one
Bigfoot species might be involved, each with its
own behavior concerning companions that have
died. Some of these Bigfeet types might even
pass for human if shaved and dressed in a
suit...or might even attend a funeral deep in
the forest for one of their own. John Green
writes ("Sasquatch-The Apes Among Us," 1978) of
probably the simplest Bigfoot death rite. It
was reported to him that in 1949 two older
males and a female Bigfoot were seen to lay out
the body of a dead young female high on a
rock at the top of a mountain. Unfortunately
though, John didn’t believe it, and never
followed up on the report,but it seems
reasonable in light of some of the following
reports.The following new report is in response
to a recent news article about the Western
Bigfoot Society ("This Week," 12/30/92, George
Earley). Called in by Ray Nab, an electrical
contractor; the secondhand tale went: Near
Estacada,OR, a Molalla hunting friend said he
had found two years ago, a dead...baby Bigfoot,
a brown female, "just a furry little animal,"
that was left ten feet up in the boughs of a
tree, and then was covered with other
boughs...an "Indian style burial," he said. (is
it possible that it was?) Attention was called
to the tree by piles of huge droppings around
its base. One can almost visualize a grieving
female Bigfoot staying near the remains of
her dead young, as has been reported with many
other primates(snow monkeys and gorillas)...have
speculated on disease causing the death of the
infant. Portland State University was
contacted, the finder thinking they would be
very interested in a new species of animal.
He, of course, got the old horse laugh...they
wouldn't even look, and the creature
reportedly is now in his deep freeze. The
college later called back, apologized, and
asked to see the corpse, but the harm had
been done, and he told 'em where to
go. Still, even this tree "interment" is
again quite simple, and might have been done
by a creature without any "intelligence," in the
human context...elephant like, if you will.
Names and addresses have been released to
Peter Byrne for further investigation. If not a
hoax. He hopes to procure tissue samples for
DNA analysis. He also says any information will
be shared with the WBS. Peter also comments he
has found human Native American tree burials,
though in coffins, in B.C., Canada(The witness
ultimately disappeared, and contact was not
made). Considerably more advanced in
technique, .is another new report from the
Estacada area in the summer of 1992. The
investigator wants to sit on this one until
he checks it out personally, but gave me
the essentials. His informant, well
educated...teaches philosophy, had
an experience east of Estacada last summer.
He was "hiking, 4-5 hours into the woods,
when he heard a, "clink, clink, clink," of
rocks. Curiously approaching the upstream
noise, he was less than a hundred yards away
from two Bigfeet...he wasn't sure if the larger
was a male and the smaller a female, or two
females. There were also two smaller red colored
young Bigfootlets. All were engaged in burying
another dead Bigfoot under a pile of stones.
They had not dug a hole, but were
just covering the body with the stones,
causing the "clacking" noise. The informant
said he had an intense feeling of sorrow, and
that the Bigfeet were acting "sad." (Realize
that I might be somewhat anthropomorphic in
reporting that piece of information.) Maybe
we'll have some bones from this one this spring?
But no, later the investigator found that
flooding had completely washed away the stones
and he couldn't find the site again. Peter
Byrne quotes of a report from Glenn Thomas
("Bigfoot," 1975, Guenette, and "Bigfoot:
Opposing Viewpoints," 1989, Gaffron,) describing
where three adult Bigfeet had dug a deep hole
with their hands as tools,and buried a fourth
dead Bigfoot. After the hole was filled in they
rolled huge boulders, weighing several hundred
pounds each, over the site.These "rock" burials
are not new, and as more and more reports come
in, patterns begin to emerge. Again Peter
Byrne related in a recent telephone
conversation, where he had a new report from an
elderly gentleman; that 35-40 years ago in
northern Washington (still being investigated),
the witness had seen three Bigfeet burying a
fourth. With the multiple numbers of animals
reported in the burial rites (usually three or
four), one could almost speculate on a "family
funeral service" of intelligent beings. Can they
be so much different than ourselves? And so we
suspect where the bones might be? Vic
McDaniel (Track Record #3) reported that a
relative near Klamath Agency, OR, while
constructing a road, ran his 'dozer through
a curious twenty foot ring of large boulders,
with smaller stones in the center. The next
day and on several peculiar occasions
afterwards, the stones had been replaced in
their original positions after he had 'dozedthem
away. He eventually built his road around the
area. Don't have a specific Bigfoot in this
tale, but speculate that the stones were
moved by something big and strong...perhaps a
Bigfoot grave? How long would a Blgfoot mourn
a dead companion? Or perhaps, a Bigfoot was
playing some complicated game with one of
those "curious" humans. Strange piles of
rocks, possible burials, in the forest are
common in issues of the Track Record. One in
particular (TR #19) tells of gold miners
finding in 1985, a fifty foot clearing in the
forest near the Calapooya River, OR, where
the tops of all the trees around
the perimeter were broken off. In the
clearing also was an old deer carcass and two
piles of smooth, five-inch cobble rocks, about
two and a half feet high, and separated by
twenty feet. The miners had been scared
the previous evening from strange screams and
the sound of breaking trees. Was never able
to excavate these particular piles, but am sure
others are out there waiting. Investigator
Scott White reported strange gravel rocks in
a clearing with smashed trees (TR #13), and WBS
speaker Sue Sebring reported several unusual
cobble piles in the forest near Starkey, OR
(TR #17). How about dead Bigfeet? The
literature is full of reports of them being
shot, ran over by cars, trucks, and even a train
(TR #21). In 1965 the southbound Southern
Pacific hit a Bigfoot on route from Bend to
Klamath Falls, OR. The body was reported to be
an enormous, shaggy, ape-like being which was
stone dead. It was never reported because the
crew didn't want to be accused of drinking on
the job. Often, reports appear that Bigfoot
can't be killed by guns. But successful
shootings seem to keep turning up. Grover Krantz
tells of a hunter killing one in 1970 near
Spokane, WA, (The scientist Looks
At Sasquatch, 1977, ed. Sprague and Krantz).
A recent report in the Bigfoot Co-Op, by
Director Rich Grumley, tells of hunter burials
of Bigfeet in Georgia and near Sonora,
Mexico. Rich says in Georgia, 1943, close to
the S.C. border (recent letter), a Bigfoot was
shotgunned because it was killing sheep and
calves by tearing off their legs. It was
bigger than the box of the pickup truck it was
hauled to town with, and the reddish-brown
corpse was reported buried under a pile of
rocks on the outskirts of town (The Apes
Among Us, 1978, Green, p. 370). Another
report from investigator Datus Perry (TR #5)
tells of a hunter near the Green River, WA,
seeing a bear grubbing a log. He shot it, and
then noticed he had killed a "hairy man," so
rolled the log over the body and didn't report
it until years later on his deathbed. John
Green reported (1978) that in June of 1971 the
Salem, OR, "Capital Journal" carried a report
from near Happy Camp, CA, where two young
girls had found a dead Bigfoot along a forest
road. The body was well rotted away, white
ribs showing, face gone, but they did see on the
hands...squared off dark finger nails. Mr. Green
investigated, and believed the girls actually
found a dead Bigfoot, based on a report from the
"Ostman kidnapping," of those Bigfeet also
having dark fingernails (only primates have
nails). In Track Record #22, and at the WBS
meeting last October, Peter Byrne told about
two fisherman finding a dead Bigfoot along the
trail near Penticton, B.C., Canada. The men
first smelled the rotting corpse, and as they
were investigating it, heard something moving in
the brush. Not knowing if it was another of
the creatures (watching over its dead mate?)
or a bear attracted by the smell, they left
hurriedly. Ten days later the wildlife people
could find nothing but a stain on the
trail. Had a bear eaten the carrion? Or
perhaps a grieving companion buried the
remains? So, where are the bones?
Well...technically, Bigfoot doesn't exist,
he’s a myth...so there can’t be any bones. Or
can there? A couple hiking in the interior of
British Columbia found a Bigfoot skeleton
washing out of the river bank (misplaced my
reference on this one-think it was Green).
The bones were too heavy to carry, but the wife
did pack out the huge lower jawbone, against her
husband’s wishes. The Univ. of B.C. and B.C.
Museum were invited to view the jaw,
but...Bigfoot is a myth. The scientists couldn’t
waste their valuable time, and eventually years
later the cabin burned...and the jawbone.
However, Grover Krantz ("Big Footprints,
1992) says, "I have spent a good deal of time
trying to Track down stories of enormous jaws
and other bones, only to find that the specimen
either was quite normal or else it could not be
located." Have since commented in the Track
Record for hikers to be alert for bones
washing out of banks along the volcanic areas of
Mt. St. Helens, along river or creek banks,
and other similar areas. Bigfoot, like
any other animal could be killed naturally
during an eruption, or have lightning strike
him, or fall into a river and drown, his bones
settling in the mud. Myra Shackley ("Still
Living? Yeti, Sasquatch, and the Neanderthal
Enigma," 1983, page 64) has even commented on a
drowned Yeti seen in a swollen river in
Asia. An amazing story that Cliff Olson told;
was that in the spring 15 years ago Grover
Kiggens, diseased, went to see what his dog was
playing with, and took a human-like skull away
from him. Talked to Mrs. Millie Kiggens, now
close to 70 years old, but still recalls the
incident. The dog actually brought the skull to
her husband, and she described it at the time as
still having some old, dried, brownish hair and
skin/flesh adhering to it, and belonging to a
young creature, perhaps 5-6 years of age. The
lower jaw was still partly there. There had
been a lot of "screeching" in the forest on
several of the previous nights. Thinking it
human, they sent it to the crime lab, and their
report...the skull was not human! Next the
human-looking skull with no sloping forehead and
normal looking teeth, no long canines, went to
the Regional primate center, but they wouldn’t
talk to her...just returned the skull with a
note. They sent it to the University of British
Columbia, and finally had to go retrieve it
themselves after two years, as UBC drug their
feet and wouldn’t return it, they wouldn’t
commit themselves as to what it was. The
Regional Primate center was better, but said
they couldn’t identify it. They did comment
that the sutures on the skull resembled those
of a giraffe (tho' they knew it wasn’t). Next it
went to the Univ. of Calif., and after a
binge of excitement about a possible
new primate, they told her it was from an elk
(even they could see it wasn’t), and has
disappeared into the maws of that
institution. There was some correspondence at
the time that she'll try to find and send us,
maybe we can track something down. I'll look
into it if I can, but Jim Hewkin recalls trying
years before to track it down unsuccessfully.
Millie says she took some photos also...thinks
she sent them to John Green, but not sure. Will
query him about the Photos. Follow-up. Mrs.
Kiggens sent a document signed by a Dr. Turner
of Berkeley, CA. "...please tell him he can
be proud...is ultimately Responsible for
discovery new species and legal
protection. Slow going partly because legal
protection requires species known to science,
hence named and described based upon physical
material. several others and I cautious about
going out on limb...process of elimination was
very tedious, but skull is 'new.'" Western
Union, 11/08/76. Vic McDaniel also reported
(TR #6) that his uncle had found a Bigfoot
skull near Antelope Flat in Lake County, OR.
They took it to a Portland College where it
was returned, but only after it had been
taken completely apart into its component
pieces. He was indeed miffed, but both Vic
and his friend Roy said they gave uncle a long
written report. The colleges don't seem to
have a good reputation when it comes
to keeping track of some of the really
interesting items. Slate and
Berry("Bigfoot," 1976) have a long detailed tale
about a mule kicking up the top of a skull, the
calvarium. It also disappeared at the U Of CA,
with denials of their having ever seen it. You
can almost picture the "What, me worry?" types
examining it. The B.C. museum is supposed to
have a huge jawbone...but no one at the museum
knows where it iS, except that it is crated and
in storage ("Bigfoot," 1989, Guenette). Even
Ivan Sanderson ("Abominable Snowman," 1972)
reported bones that had been shipped to Wrexham
Museum, North Wales, England. They must have
evaporated, as no trace of them was ever found.
They, once again, had been reported washing
out of a riverbank on Shushwap Island, B.C., the
teeth of huge size without cavities, and the
entire skeleton eight footlong with skull (Alan
Landsburg, "In search Of Myths And Monsters,"
saw in a college museum in Dublin, Ireland, a
human skeleton of 8'6"). Another strange
disappearance was reported by Dr. Alan L. Bryan,
Univ. of Alberta, who took photos of a
beetle-browed hominid skull, perhaps Homo
erectus, in Brazil. Returning to study further,
it had disappeared ("Search For The First
Americans," Nat. Geo., Sept. 1979). Are the
bones disappearing on purpose...is there some
sinister plan involved? Mostly I doubt it,
assuming our government isn't
directly involved in a disinformation plan,
as I don't think that "jealous" scientists
could put together a good enough "plot," and a
scientist's name could be "made" if he could
prove the existence of Bigfoot, so maybe the
specimens are in some cabinet waiting to be
"re-discovered." Have speculated about a rich
collector offering sizable sums to museum or
university people for new additions to their
collections. Also, one might wonder if there
would be another "spotted owl" crisis if Bigfoot
were proved to exist. And the bones? There
appear to be plenty of 'em out there, if
they don't disappear, and we just have to be
a bit more careful of who we turn stuff over
to when it's outside the realm of existing
"science"... make sure you have a photograph
and get a receipt! Remember that
most scientists outside of their chosen field
are amateurs like you and I. Perhaps this'll
be the year that we finally confirm
Bigfoot...the goal of the Western Bigfoot
Society...and our hopes of confirmation
are for bones to be found, or a "road k111"
to be reported in time for us to study the
corpse.
|